Free AI visibility tool
AI Robots.txt Checker
See whether important AI and search crawlers are allowed to fetch your homepage, sitemap, blog, docs, pricing, and about pages.
Technical lab snapshot
AI audit command
AI Robots.txt Checker
Example command center
Good but missing signalsGood
AI crawl, extractability, schema, citation and freshness signals.
AI Crawler Access
robots.txt · sitemap · key paths| Crawler | Status | Homepage | Blog | Docs | Sitemap |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBot | Blocked | No | No | No | No |
| OAI-SearchBot | Allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ChatGPT-User | Allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| ClaudeBot | Allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PerplexityBot | Allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Google-Extended | Allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Googlebot | Allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Bingbot | Allowed | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Premium report
Unlock competitor prompts, historical tracking, and PDF-ready client reports
Keep the free technical score, then upgrade when you need saved audit history, automated prompt tracking, and deeper content recommendations.
What this checks
How to fix
Example report
Sample grade: Good but missing visibility signals.
Citation-ready guide
What is AI Robots.txt Checker?
An AI robots.txt checker reviews whether important AI and search crawlers can access public pages that should be discovered, summarized, and cited.
| Visibility factor | Points | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| AI crawler access | 20 | AI systems need permission and reachable URLs before they can evaluate your content. |
| Sitemap / llms.txt / robots health | 15 | Healthy crawl directives and canonical files reduce ambiguity. |
| Entity clarity / schema | 20 | Entity clarity helps models connect your brand, product, author, and social proof. |
| Answer extractability | 20 | Concise answers, FAQs, tables, and steps make citation more likely. |
| Citation-worthiness | 15 | Evidence, sources, comparisons, and data improve trust and answer inclusion. |
| Freshness / update signals | 10 | Visible dates and sitemap updates help AI systems avoid stale claims. |
Evidence model
How the recommendation is grounded
AI visibility work needs observable signals, not only prompt anecdotes. This page maps each recommendation back to files, structured data, visible page content, and repeatable monitoring fields.
| Signal | Method | Evidence to keep |
|---|---|---|
| Crawler access | Fetch robots.txt, sitemap.xml, llms.txt, and the homepage, then test key AI and search user agents against priority paths. | Crawler matrix, HTTP status, file content type, and blocked path list. |
| Entity clarity | Parse JSON-LD, title, meta description, H1, logo, social links, author signals, and brand facts. | Detected schema types, Organization/WebSite fields, sameAs links, and visible brand positioning. |
| Answer extractability | Check whether the page gives a direct definition, short summary, list/table structure, FAQ blocks, and source-backed claims. | H1-adjacent answer text, table/list presence, FAQ detection, and source/citation language. |
| Freshness | Compare visible dates, structured dateModified values, sitemap lastmod, and current-year evidence. | Last updated text, sitemap timestamp, and date-related metadata. |
Search intent
ai robots.txt checker
Users want to understand and improve ai robots.txt checker with practical checks and repeatable workflows.
Related long-tail searches
Page elements this query needs
Recommended fixes
How to improve AI Robots.txt Checker
Comparison
How this differs from a normal SEO check
Search rankings still matter, but AI answers add a second selection layer: the engine must be able to extract the right facts and trust the page enough to cite it.
| Approach | Covers | What to watch |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional SEO audit | Indexability, titles, descriptions, backlinks, core web vitals, and search intent. | Often misses whether AI systems can summarize, cite, and recommend the brand in generated answers. |
| Generic AI prompt test | A small set of manual prompts in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, or Google AI Overview. | Shows symptoms, but usually does not explain which technical or content signals caused the result. |
| AI Robots.txt Checker workflow | Crawler access, llms.txt, schema, entity facts, extractable answers, citations, freshness, and prompt tracking. | Best used as a prioritization layer before deeper content, authority, and PR work. |
Competitors and platforms
Where this fits in the AI search stack
Use the same audit structure for your domain, competitors, and category pages. The strongest opportunities usually appear where a competitor is mentioned by an AI answer but your owned pages are absent from citations.
Last updated: June 26, 2026
ChatGPT
Benefits from accessible pages, clear entity facts, fresh public sources, and pages that answer category prompts directly.
Perplexity
Often rewards pages with concise summaries, tables, dated evidence, and citation-friendly URLs.
Claude
Needs crawlable pages and clearly structured explanations that avoid burying the core answer.
Gemini
Relies on search visibility, schema, entity consistency, and Google-readable freshness signals.
Google AI Overview
Usually appears where pages already satisfy search intent and include trustworthy answer blocks.
Core topic cluster
Build the full AI visibility workflow
FAQ
Common questions
What does AI Robots.txt Checker measure?
AI Robots.txt Checker focuses on whether a page can be crawled, understood, summarized, and cited by AI answer systems and search engines.
How should teams use AI Robots.txt Checker?
Use it to find technical blockers first, then prioritize pages that need clearer entity facts, concise answer blocks, schema, source-backed claims, and monitoring prompts.
Is this the same as traditional SEO?
No. SEO still matters, but AI visibility also depends on whether AI systems can access your pages, extract direct answers, identify brand entities, and cite reliable sources.
Do I need llms.txt?
It is not a replacement for robots.txt or schema, but it is a useful public summary that lists important pages and brand facts for AI-oriented crawlers and tools.
Should every AI crawler be allowed?
Not always. The right policy depends on your content model. This tool highlights blockers and tradeoffs so you can choose deliberately.
Can this automatically check every AI platform?
The first version focuses on technical detection and manual tracking. Automatic monitoring can be added later with platform-specific integrations.
Check AI crawler access
Download a report, copy recommended fixes, generate llms.txt, or keep a manual tracking log for AI brand monitoring.